Image: By Urban (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
Case in point: Last night I was watching an entertaining
program called The Americas Before
Columbus on the National Geographic Channel. Most of the content
corresponded with facts burned into my brain years ago in elementary school.
Then they got to the story of the Spanish explorer, Hernando de Soto. To quote
directly, the narrator said, “De Soto sailed up the Mississippi River to
explore the interior…” My jaw dropped.
I learned in elementary school that De Soto started in
Florida and travelled across Georgia, the Carolinas, Tennessee, Alabama,
Mississippi, and on into Arkansas, where he died of malaria.
The passage of his expedition left a trail of devastation that lasted for years
as European diseases decimated the native population. After the death of their
leader, the Spanish survivors built boats and floated down the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico, where they were
eventually rescued.
How can screenwriters and producers put such egregiously
wrong information in what are supposed to be documentaries? I’ll admit that I
have no answer to that question, except perhaps, “Everybody does it.” For
anyone vaguely familiar with the history of World War II, many of the TV programs
on the subject are riddled with inaccuracies. Weapons available late in the war
are shown supposedly invading Poland in 1939. Commentary purportedly about one
army will overlay film footage of their enemies. Footage of suicide attacks off
Okinawa often accompanies text about much earlier battles. The writers and film editors appear to
have no grasp of the history of the war.
I fear that they don’t want to take the trouble to get their facts
straight.
“So, what?” you may ask. What bothers me is that many of
these programs are used in school history programs. Once people have “learned” information
incorrectly, they have to “unlearn” the material before they can understand the
real lessons of history. I believe that writers have a responsibility to get
their facts straight before calling them history.
A good deal of misinformation about the battles around the
Philippines early in the Pacific War has appeared in print and on television.
The detractors of General Douglas MacArthur have gone to great lengths to lay on
him the responsibility for the loss of most of the U.S. air forces on December
8, 1941. Most imply if not say outright that protective measures were not taken
before the Japanese attacks. In my research for my novel, Hold Back the Sun, I discovered that what really happened was far
different. First, MacArthur ordered all the B-17s to be relocated to Mindanao,
outside the range of Japanese bombers, two
weeks before Pearl Harbor. The movement was delayed for reasons never fully
explained. On the morning after the Hawaii attack, all U.S. aircraft on Luzon
were ordered aloft before dawn to preclude being caught on the ground. The
Japanese attack did not come as expected because fog on Formosa prevented them
taking off. The American planes landed only when they began to run out of fuel.
The planes were parked on the tarmac because the surrounding ground was swampy
and would not support their weight.
As luck would have it, the enemy aircraft arrived while the B-17s and P-40s
were being refueled.
Note: Warren Bell's debut novel, Fall Eagle One, detailing a fictitious but plausible assassination attempt on FDR during World War II, (Semi-Finalist in the Kindle Indie Book Review Best Books of 2012) is available for Kindle or in paperback on Amazon.com. His newest novel, Hold Back the Sun, has been released for Kindle in advance of the printed book launch. This new historical-fiction thriller, set in the Pacific, follows the US Asiatic Fleet in their battle with the Japanese in WWII.
No comments:
Post a Comment